Conversive vs. Conversagent

The company I work for (Conversive) just settled a case against one of our competitors (Conversagent) over trademark infringement. I got a copy of the summary judgment last night. It wasn’t too hard to read, but there were plenty of things I didn’t understand. What I did get is that the judge found our trademarks on “Conversive” and “Conversive Agent” to be valid, to have priority, and that the use of “Conversagent” by a direct competitor is confusing.

Leave a Reply